Related posts:

1. VMware View and Xsigo

While troubleshooting another issue a week or two ago I came across this VMware knowledge base article. Having spent most of the time with other brand arrays in the past, I thought this was a pretty cool solution verses just increasing the queue length of the HBA. I would recommend setting this on your 3par BEFORE you get QFULL problems. Additionally, Netapp has an implementation of this as well.

Be sure to read the note at the bottom especially:

If hosts running operating systems other than ESX are connected to array ports that are being accessed by ESX hosts, while the latter are configured to use the adaptive algorithm, make sure those operating systems use an adaptive queue depth algorithm as well or isolate them on different ports on the storage array.

I do need to dig deeper how this affects performance as the queue begins to fill, not sure if one method is better than another. Is this the new direction that many Storage Vendors will follow?

Until then, the best advice is to do what your storage vendor recommends, especially if they say it is critical.

Here is a quick run through for you.

In the vSphere Client

Select the ESX host and go to the configuration tab and click on the Advanced Settings under Software.

In the Advanced Settings

Select the option for Disk and scroll down to the QFullSampleSize and QFullThreshold.
Change the values to the 3par recommended values:
QFullSampleSize = 32
QFullThreshold = 4

Related posts:

1. iSCSI Connections on EqualLogic PS Series
2. Fibre or Ethernet Saturation – Which comes First?
3. ESX Commands – esxcfg-hwiscsi

Equallogic PS Series Design Considerations

VMware vSphere introduces support for multipathing for iSCSI. Equallogic released a recommended configuration for using MPIO with iSCSI.   I have a few observations after working with MPIO and iSCSI. The main lesson is know the capabilities of the storage before you go trying to see how man paths you can have with active IO.

1. EqualLogic defines a host connection as 1 iSCSI path to a volume. At VMware Partner Exchange 2010 I was told by a Dell guy, “Yeah, gotta read those release notes!”
2. EqualLogic limits the number of hosts in the to 128 per pool or 256 per group connections in the 4000 series (see table 1 for full breakdown) and to 512/2048 per pool/group connections in the 6000 series arrays.
3. The EqualLogic MPIO recommendation mentioned above can consume many connections with just a few vSphere hosts.

I was under the false impression that by “hosts” we were talking about physical connections to the array. Especially since the datasheet says “Hosts Accessing PS series Group”. It actually means iSCSI connections to a volume. Therefore if you have 1 host with 128 volumes singly connected via 1 iSCSI path each, you are already at your limit (on the PS4000).

An example of how fast vSphere iSCSI MPIO (Round Robin) can consume available connections can be seen this this scenario. Five vSphere hosts with 2 network cards each on the iSCSI network. If we follow the whitepaper above we will create 4 vmkernel ports per host. Each vmkernel creates an additional connection per volume. Therefore if we have 10 300 GB volumes for datastores we already have 200 iSCSI connections to our Equallogic array. Really no problem for the 6000 series but the 4000 will start to drop connections. I have not even added the connections created by the vStorage API/VCB capable backup server. So here is a formula*:

N – number of hosts

V – number of vmkernel ports

T – number of targeted volumes

B – number of connections from the backup server

C – number of connections

(N * V * T) + B = C

Use multiple pools within the group in order to avoid dropped iSCSI connections and provide scalability. This reduces the number of spindles you are hitting with your IO. Using care to know the capacity of the array will help avoid big problems down the road.

*I have seen the connections actually be higher and I can only figure this is because the way EqualLogic does iSCSI redirection.

Related posts:

1. Using iSCSI to get some big ole disk in a Virtual Machine
2. ESX Commands: esxcfg-vmknic
3. Random Half Thoughts While Driving

Due to the performance hit while zeroing mentioned in the Thin Provisioning Performance white paper this article in the VMware knowledge base could be of some good use.

I would suggest using eagerzeroedthick for any high IO tier 1 type of Virtual Machine. This can be done when creating the VMDK from the GUI by selecting the “Support Clustering Features such as Fault Tolerance” check box.

So go out and check your VMDK’s.

Related posts:

1. The Missing VMDK
2. From Professional VMware – Virtual Machine Disk Sizing Tool
3. VMware View – User Profile Options

Recently I have spent time re-thinking certain configuration scenarios and asking myself, “Why?” If there is something I do day to day during installs is this still true when it comes to vSphere? or will it still be true when it comes to future versions.
Lately I have questioned how I deploy LUNs/volumes/datastores. I usually deploy multiple moderate size datastores. In my opinion this was always the best way to fit in MOST situations. I also will create datastores based on need afterward. So will create some general use datastores then add a bigger or smaller store based on performance/storage needs. After all the research I have done and asking questions on twitter* I still think this is a good plan in most situations.
I went over a VMworld.com session TA3220 – VMware vStorage VMFS-3 Architectural Advances since ESX 3.0 and read this paper:
http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/1059
I also went over some blog posts at Yellow-Bricks.com and Virtualgeek.

An idea occurred to me when it comes to using extents in VMFS, SCSI Reservations/Locks, and VDI “Boot Storms”. First some things a picked up.
1. Extents are not “spill and fill” VMFS places VM files across all the LUNs. Not quite what I would call load balancing, since it does not take IO load into account when placing files. So in situations where all the VM’s have similar loads this won’t be a problem.
2. Only the first LUN in a VMFS span gets locked by “storage and VMFS Administrative tasks” (Scalable Storage Performance pg 9). Not sure if this implies all locks.

Booting 100′s of VM’s for VMware View will cause locking and even though vSphere is much better when it comes to how quickly this process takes. There is still an impact. So I am beginning to think of a disk layout to ease administration for VDI, and possibly lay the groundwork for improved performance. Here is my theory:

Create four LUNs with 200GB each. Use VMFS to extents to group them together. Resulting in an 800 GB datastore with 4 disk queues and only 1 LUN that locks during administrative tasks.

Give this datastore to VMware View and let it have at it. Since the IO load for each VM is mostly the same, and really at the highest during boot other tasks performed on the LUN after the initial boot storm will have even less impact. So we can let desktops get destroyed and rebuilt/cloned all day with only locking that first LUN. This part I still need to confirm in the LAB.

What I have seen in the lab is with same sized clones the data on disk was spread pretty evenly across the LUNs.

Any other ideas? Please leave a comment. Maybe I am way off base.

*(thanks to @lamw @jasonboche and @sakacc for discussing or answering my tweets)

Related posts:

1. VCDX – Nugget — Identify iSCSI, Fibre Channel
2. The Forging of the new Network/VMware/Storage Professional
3. My Fun with the VMware Enterprise Administration and Design Exams

First, I have lived in the South too long, because I said “Big ole disk” and couldn’t think of a more appropriate phrase. Now someone rescue me if I start to tell you to “mash” the power button on your server or SAN. I kid.

I am sure everyone out there has used this before but I like to document these things just case someone else needs help.

A coworker and I were installing a vSphere environment last week to support some new software for a customer. The software vendor required approximately 30 x 146GB drives in a Raid 5 to store images. Never would guess the software vendor happens to sell SANs too! I exaggerate it actually called for 3TB of usable space.

So my thought was to get over 2TB limit of VMFS we would need to use the MS iSCSI initiator inside the VM. Then my coworker thought we could enable MPIO using two virtual Nics with vmxnet3. We tied each vmxnet3 nic to a separate port group and assigned one of the 2 physical NICs to each port group. Additionally vmxnet3 lets you enable jumbo frames and the physical nics were already set to mtu 9000 because this was on the software iscsi vswitch. So we were able to get multiple paths from the VM to the network and have jumbo frames all the way through.

Next we presented the iSCSI volume of 3TB to the Windows machines. Of course at first it sees it as a couple of smaller volumes. Convert the disk to GPT and align to 64k, then format with NTFS. Just like that a 3TB disk inside a Virtual Machine.

Now we saw IOMETER push better sequential IO than an RDM that was set up for Round Robin, but not quite as good in the Random IO department as a RDM.

The main gain here is to get a file bigger than 2TB minus 512B. Useful for the scan/image servers that store a tons of files for a long time.

To sum up and make it clear.

1. Use the Microsoft iSCSI initiator and MPIO inside the VM when you need more than 2TB on  a disk.

2. Use 2 port groups and bind them to separate physical nics to let the MPIO actually work over 2 nics.

3. With vSphere use the VMXNET3 driver for network to use jumbo frames, the E1000 driver does not support this.

Related posts:

1. From Professional VMware – Virtual Machine Disk Sizing Tool
2. iSCSI Connections on EqualLogic PS Series
3. ESX Commands: esxcfg-vmknic

This is the kind of stuff I love to find. Good stuff all in one place. The Storage customer service team identified several of the top KB entries that could help in a pinch. Check them out on the VMware Knowledge Base Blog.

I have a personal experience with:

1002511 Recreating a missing VMDK (header) file

It would relate back to this post.

So thanks a bunch Storage Heavy Hitters!

Related posts:

1. The Forging of the new Network/VMware/Storage Professional
2. The Missing VMDK
3. VMware Knowledge Base Videos